Reality First - Combat, Violence and Aggession

Teaching of combat and violence for stage and fight direction, based upon the teachings of John Waller, which have been used for over 40 years. This approach has been used by a number of fight teachers and directors. It is currently actively being taught by Jonathan Waller, Kristina Soeborg, Rodney Cottier, Jonathan Mitchell as well as many others, in the UK, and across the world from Italy to Mexico...

Tuesday 25 June 2013

Things they get wrong #1 Dead mans 10

This will be part of an ongoing series....
It will address areas that a commonly wrong or misrepresented in combat scenes, on stage or in film.
Too often people just drop dead, when hot by a "fatal" blow.
The only thing that will instantly stop life and body function is the so called "sniper shot" which severs the brain stem.
Otherwise the damage caused, while it may be fatal, will technically mean that the the person can still continue to function for a certain amount of time, from seconds to minutes or even hours.

The expression mentioned above, the dead man's 10, is reportedly from western gun fighters, basically it means that even after receiving a fatal shot, for example a bullet through the heart, I will still be able to function for at least 10 seconds.

However this doesn't mean that people don't drop down when hit. But when they do it is because of their reaction to being hit. Most of the time people give mentally before their body gives up.

So next time you see our read a fight where someone conveniently drops when hit, ask yourself, do you believe that is what the character would actually do?

Friday 21 June 2013

Words are a shorthand....

Language is tricky, the same word can mean different things to different people or the same thing but in different contexts. This is more true when it comes to teaching, especially teaching something physical or movement based.

 A word or the words are what use to try to describe a context etc. is a short hand, the problem is that to truly understand the short hand you have to have seen the picture or felt and understood it to get it.

It's why students will eventually turn around and say something like... "You know.... I should do such and such" with a slight sound of accusation in their voice. Of course what they are telling you is something that you have told them time and again since their first lesson. The difference now though is that they have finally gotten it, it has clicked inside them and the concept has been revealed. The first thing they then need to do is tell someone about it. In this case it's the teacher who has been telling them all along.


I have also noted with people how have physical skills but who are new to teaching, that they use too many words when they start teaching and try to explain too many things at once. They have had their aha! moments and are keen to pass their revelations on, and think that if only someone could have revealed all this stuff to them they would have gotten it much quicker. They have not yet realising or remembering how long it took them to get there. They haven’t understood that it’s about saying the right things at the right time, speaking at the right time and doing things at the right time.

Friday 14 June 2013

I'm not very co-ordinated... I'm clumsy

Students will often claim this when they find a move difficult or when they take time to improve areas of body structure etc.
They will often use it as a justification for why things don't change or improve.

If one asks them why they think they are clumsy the general response it that they bump in to things or drop stuff. I ask them if other people don't? Of course we all bump in to stuff and drop things. But some people get told they are clumsy when they do this and so they start to believe it and attach the label to themselves

Of course some people do do these things more often but in this case it more often than not die to Awareness or rather its sporadic application .

However the label of clumsy is easy as if I can say I am clumsy then it is something I am, not something I am responsible for, something that I can change.

We can all make claim to some defect or other, however there are very few things that can not be changed or over some with the will and a focus and mindset to make it happen


Facts and Figures 2013

This Academic year (2012-13) so far...
159 Students (including Rutgers and Guildhall)went through the various exams
Standard 61 Students (Plus 35 from Guildhall and Rutgers)
Advanced Modules 194 Modules (72 Students)
- 30 Students Completed Advanced
- 42 Students tested on ASW
Specialisations 27 (24 Students)
Of all the students taught at the three schools only 6 students took no exam, most of those were to do with physical conditions that meant they could not take part in classes

For comparison to last year


2012
2013
 Increase
Standard
135
159
15%
Advanced Complete
21
30
30%
Advanced Single Weapon
26
42
38%
Specialisations
19
24
20%


The gloved hand

I recently was reading a Stage Combat blog. One entry was about a new pair of stage combat gloves the writer had bought. Gloves seem to be a must in Stage combat in the US, though they are popular amongst other organisations and individuals.
I think I have mentioned that we don't allow anyone to use gloves to start with, though in certain circumstances with heavier weapons we do allow it in performance, though generally not in training...

I posted a question to the blog post, Why the need for gloves, that I had never received a satisfactory answer to this.
Posted below is his response
To protect your hands from the swords and the swords from your hands. Little dings on the hand that might have been bloody will just be bruises if you’re wearing gloves — especially when you’re using weapons without a big fancy guard, or working in styles with hand beats or half-swording. And any moisture or sweat on your hands will start the high-carbon steel rusting.
Below my reply
It is up to the individual, of course, but these reasons don’t and have never convinced me, The best protection for the hands is to not allow them to get hit in the first place, I almost never wear gloves when I fight and don’t get hit on the hands, In my experience of teaching for over 20 years and previously to that my fathers 30 years is that people look after unprotected hands more than they do when they wear gloves. The gloves give both sides a false sense of security, especially the gloves that most stage combatants wear as they are unpadded and do nothing against a meaningful hit. Though an increase of padding just makes things worse as an increased perception of safety leads to greater risk taking. Hand beats and half swording again can be done fine, even with non rebated weapons without gloves, I have seen no real reason to use them with rebated weapons. I also hear the arguments about chips on the blades etc, but that is not a problem with well maintained blades or those crafted properly.
In regards to moisture, depends on the person, but most people don’t get sweaty hands unless they are either gripping to tightly, or wearing gloves which hold in the heat. As to moisture and possible rust on the sword, that can be dealt with by a quick clean or wipe of the weapons after use, something that should be done anyway, IMO
Hands can get hit, but they are not being specifically targeted and with properly blade placement and parries etc. they are in no more danger danger than another body part. One could argue that same chances of things going wrong could be applied to mistakes leading to face or head hits, yet no one I am aware of recommends that stage combat should be done with fencing masks or eye protection.
It is my belief that the use of gloves is received wisdom, people do it because that is what is done, the reasons for them seems to make sense and no one questions it. Or they receive a hit on the hands, caused in part because of a lack of awareness due to feeling safer in gloves and poor technique and then praise the gloves for having saved the day, rather than looking at the fact that the gloves are a major part in why the hand got hit in first place.

Facts and figures 2012

At the BADC AGM at the end of 2012 there were several reports. Amongst them was one on the number of students that had been examined by the organisation over the year.
767 students went through the various exams
From our point of view the number of our students made some interesting info.

Total in BADC
Trained by AoF
Percentage of total
Foundation
220
8
3.6%
Standard
425
135
31%
Advanced Completed
29
21
72%
Advanced Single Weapons
52
26
50%
Specialisation
23
19
82%
It is an interesting indication of what we are able to do, particularly  at LAMDA and especially at the higher levels of the process

Why don't things change....

You cannot simultaneously ignore problems and solve them.

This appears to be so obvious that it almost seems pointless to mention it... yet again and again people do just that.
When teaching one finds that students will ask if one can watch them to tell what they need to work on or improve. When you then point out a weakness, many times one gets the response.... "yes yes I know".

Well, no no! If they really knew it was wrong, they would have done several things. They would have recognised it and then in the moment done something to change it, and possibly done the movement again to effect the change in motion. They may also have told me before doing the movements that this thing was something you were having trouble with

The "yes yes, I know" response tells you that the person does not really know, rather have received the information in the past and so when you tell them again they think they know it.

Real knowing, knowledge, changes you and how you behave. Just receiving information doesn't DO anything,  how you use that information is what does something.

To affect a change in yourself you have to be Aware of it!



Fight Night 2013 and exam done...

ANother one done for this year...

95 people through the exam
76 fighters in Fight Night
16 Standards
100 Advanced Modules
27 Specialisations

A lot of work done during that last few weeks....